Dizilab.pw - SEO Checker - Website Review

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

REZULTATI: NOGOMET, 1. HNL, PREMIER LEAGUE, SPORTSKI REZULTATI UŽIVO, LIVESCORE

rezultati.com

BERANDA | PORTAL RESMI PEMERINTAH PROVINSI DKI JAKARTA

jakarta.go.id

ДНЕВНИК.РУ

dnevnik.ru

慕课网-程序员的梦工厂

imooc.com

有声小说,听小说,有声书,在线听书电台-喜马拉雅FM

ximalaya.com

VITUX - LINUX COMPENDIUM

vitux.com

СПОРТ.UA ⇔ СВЕЖИЕ НОВОСТИ СПОРТА ОНЛАЙН ⋆ ВСЕ ПРО СПОРТ УКРАИНЫ И МИРА НА СЕГОДНЯ

sport.ua

Latest Sites

CASINO REVIEWS AND GAME BONUSES - JENNYCASINO.COM

jennycasino.com

AMAZON.COM

amazon.com

powerofdream.co.id

BITMINEROPTIONS

bitmineroptions.com

欢迎访问本网站

gtr.com

OMEGAPRO FOREX

omegaprofx.com

LUXCITI : TIENDA ONLINE DE PRODUCTOS DE PELUQUERÍA, COMPRAS ONLINE ESPAÑA

luxciti.es

Top Technologies

Nginx

Web Servers

PHP

Programming Languages

Google Tag Manager

Tag Managers

Google Font API

Font Scripts

CloudFlare

CDN

jQuery

JavaScript Frameworks

Apache

Web Servers

Font Awesome

Font Scripts

WordPress

CMS

Twitter Bootstrap

Web Frameworks

29 dizilab.pw Last Updated: 12 months

Success 78% of passed verification steps

Warning 7% of total warning

Errors 15% of total errors, require fast action

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 95%

Best Practices Desktop Score 77%

SEO Desktop Score 91%

Progressive Web App Desktop Score 46%

Performance Mobile Score 85%

Best Practices Mobile Score 85%

SEO Mobile Score 100%

Progressive Web App Mobile Score 56%

Page Authority Authority 33%

Domain Authority Domain Authority 30%

Moz Rank 3.3/10

Bounce Rate Rate 0%

Title Tag 28 Characters

DIZILAB. | YABANCI DIZI IZLE

Meta Description 129 Characters

Sevdiğiniz tüm yabancı dizileri tek bir platform üzerinden sosyal olarak izlemenize ve yabancı dizi takip etmenize olanak sağlar.

Effective URL 18 Characters

https://dizilab.pw

Excerpt Page content

dizilab. | yabancı dizi izle şifrenizi sıfırlayın. dizilab.’e kayıt olurken sisteme girdiğiniz kullanıcı adınızı veya e-posta adresinizi doğru girdiğiniz takdirde size şifrenizi sıfırlamanız için bir e-pos...

Meta Keywords 5 Detected

yabancı dizi izle en iyi yabancı diziler tüm yabancılar yabancı dizileri izleyin yabancıların dizilerini hd izleyin

Keywords Cloud Density

sezon167 bölüm151 takip23 diziler22 yabancı21 ocak18 yayınlanan18 tarihinde18 education12 yeni12

Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO

Keyword	Freq	Title	Desc	Domain	H1	H2
sezon	167
bölüm	151
takip	23
diziler	22
yabancı	21
ocak	18
yayınlanan	18
tarihinde	18
education	12
yeni	12

Google Preview Your look like this in google search result

DIZILAB. | YABANCI DIZI IZLE

https://dizilab.pw

Sevdiğiniz tüm yabancı dizileri tek bir platform üzerinden sosyal olarak izlemenize ve yabancı dizi takip etmenize olanak sağlar.

Robots.txt File Detected

http://dizilab.pw/robots.txt

Sitemap.xml File Detected

http://dizilab.pw/sitemap.xml

Whois Is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system

Updated: 2019-07-13 / 2 years

Create on: 2018-08-07 / 2 years

Expires on: 2020-08-07 / 5 months 13 days

Namecheap ,

Registrar Whois Server: whois.namecheap.com

Registrar URL: https://namecheap.com

Registrar Email: https://whois.nic.pw/contact/dizilab.pw/registrant

Nameservers

MAY.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM

PEYTON.NS.CLOUDFLARE.COM

Page Size Code & Text Ratio

Document Size: ~102.94 KB

Code Size: ~85.58 KB

Text Size: ~17.36 KB Ratio: 16.87%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

CloudFlare

CDN

PWA - Manifest

Manifest is not valid

Your site don't have valid manifest.json, read more in Web App Manifest

Desktop

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 122 KB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 431 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 600 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 360 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 30 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

JavaScript execution time 0.8 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 267 KB

Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Properly size images Potential savings of 293 KB

Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time

Speed Index 1.4 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 1.3 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 2,280 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimizes main-thread work 1.8 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 0.8 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 4 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 13 chains found

The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load

Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,435 elements

A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

First Meaningful Paint 0.8 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 129 requests • 2,280 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 77 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 70 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 1.4 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Estimated Input Latency 20 ms

Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy

Mobile

Estimated Input Latency 10 ms

First Contentful Paint (3G) 4447 ms

First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network

Tap targets are sized appropriately 100% appropriately sized tap targets

Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements

Document uses legible font sizes 99.68% legible text

Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 13 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Avoid multiple page redirects Potential savings of 780 ms

Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded

Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 620 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 790 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 50 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 110 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

JavaScript execution time 0.4 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Speed Index 4.1 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 4.1 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 615 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimizes main-thread work 1.4 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 2.3 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 3 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 6 chains found

Avoids an excessive DOM size 446 elements

First Meaningful Paint 2.4 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 71 requests • 615 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 42 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 130 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 4.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Speed And Optimization Tips

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Local Rank: / Users: / PageViews:

Global Rank

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2020 02:00:11 GMT
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: __cfduid=d1df8e5820d967e6f42d30709742d78f51579658410; expires=Fri, 21-Feb-20 02:00:10 GMT; path=/; domain=.dizilab.pw; HttpOnly; SameSite=Lax
Expires: Thu, 19 Nov 1981 08:52:00 GMT
Cache-Control: no-store, no-cache, must-revalidate, post-check=0, pre-check=0
Pragma: no-cache
Set-Cookie: PHPSESSID=ufdvb5tq3rmeu0pr9upp193r46; expires=Wed, 22-Jan-2020 05:00:11 GMT; Max-Age=10800; path=/
CF-Cache-Status: DYNAMIC
Expect-CT: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct"
Server: cloudflare
CF-RAY: 558deecb3a76e6f4-EWR
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname

View DNS Records

Type	Name	Value	Class	TTL
A	dizilab.pw	104.18.33.132	IN	238
A	dizilab.pw	104.18.32.132	IN	238
NS	dizilab.pw	may.ns.cloudflare.com	IN	3539
NS	dizilab.pw	peyton.ns.cloudflare.com	IN	3539
TXT	dizilab.pw	ca3-e241892d563e4af4b66faea683faa36a	IN	120
TXT	dizilab.pw	google-site-verification=kzR2QAn4D5gJ8j7JoQ-6RCZPJ9OymLyrB5tvDi5TdHU	IN	120
AAAA	dizilab.pw	2606:4700:3035::6812:2084	IN	238
AAAA	dizilab.pw	2606:4700:3033::6812:2184	IN	238

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

Latest Sites

Top Technologies

29 dizilab.pw Last Updated: 12 months

Desktop

Mobile

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

CloudFlare

PWA - Manifest

Desktop

Mobile

Speed And Optimization Tips

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Information Server

Comments