Newtalk.tw - SEO Checker - Website Review

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

NHENTAI: HENTAI DOUJINSHI AND MANGA

nhentai.net

ERROR: THE REQUESTED URL COULD NOT BE RETRIEVED

adliran.ir

PINCODE SEARCH, POST OFFICE DETAILS, ALL INDIA POST OFFICE DATA PINCODE.NET.IN

pincode.net.in

:: 공감언론 뉴시스통신사 ::

newsis.com

SATURDAY MORNING BREAKFAST CEREAL - PHANTASM

smbc-comics.com

˿͡(^O^)® - 饤֥Ɥ֥

himasoku.com

VER SERIES ONLINE GRATIS EN HD | SERIESPAPAYA

seriespapaya.net

Latest Sites

sha-256.io

JUST A MOMENT...

molla-tech.com

WELCOME TO BITHILS

bithils.com

GAMEAS

gameas.org

publishinglif.com

RICHSTORE

richstore.store

SPECIAL PRICE OFFER

newtaipeiqueen.com

Top Technologies

Nginx

Web Servers

PHP

Programming Languages

Google Tag Manager

Tag Managers

Google Font API

Font Scripts

CloudFlare

CDN

jQuery

JavaScript Frameworks

Apache

Web Servers

Font Awesome

Font Scripts

WordPress

CMS

Twitter Bootstrap

Web Frameworks

27 newtalk.tw Last Updated: 1 year

Success 55% of passed verification steps

Warning 15% of total warning

Errors 30% of total errors, require fast action

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 30%

Best Practices Desktop Score 54%

SEO Desktop Score 89%

Progressive Web App Desktop Score 19%

Performance Mobile Score 18%

Best Practices Mobile Score 46%

SEO Mobile Score 90%

Progressive Web App Mobile Score 22%

Page Authority Authority 51%

Domain Authority Domain Authority 55%

Moz Rank 5.1/10

Bounce Rate Rate 0%

Charset Encoding

Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8

Title Tag 11 Characters

新頭殼 NEWTALK

Meta Description 14 Characters

先驅媒體社會企業股份有限公司

Effective URL 18 Characters

https://newtalk.tw

Excerpt Page content

新頭殼 Newtalk ...

Keywords Cloud Density

more20 疑遭憲兵保防片變8 韓國瑜怒8 影射性太強8 得民調得痔瘡8 韓國瑜和平協議條件說6 讀者投書6 熱門議題6 大陸國台辦7個字6 美國少女夾睫毛談新疆集中營6

Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO

Keyword	Freq	Title	Desc	Domain	H1	H2
more	20
疑遭憲兵保防片變	8
韓國瑜怒	8
影射性太強	8
得民調得痔瘡	8
韓國瑜和平協議條件說	6
讀者投書	6
熱門議題	6
大陸國台辦7個字	6
美國少女夾睫毛談新疆集中營	6

Google Preview Your look like this in google search result

新頭殼 NEWTALK

https://newtalk.tw

先驅媒體社會企業股份有限公司

Robots.txt File No Found

http://newtalk.tw/robots.txt

Sitemap.xml File No Found

http://newtalk.tw/sitemap.xml

Whois Is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system

Updated: 1970-01-01 / 51 years

Create on: 1970-01-01 / 51 years

Expires on: 1970-01-01 / 624 months 16 days

Page Size Code & Text Ratio

Document Size: ~159.61 KB

Code Size: ~99.2 KB

Text Size: ~60.41 KB Ratio: 37.85%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

PWA - Manifest

Manifest is not valid

Your site don't have valid manifest.json, read more in Web App Manifest

Desktop

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 680 requests • 12,994 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Use video formats for animated content Potential savings of 506 KB

Large GIFs are inefficient for delivering animated content. Consider using MPEG4/WebM videos for animations and PNG/WebP for static images instead of GIF to save network bytes

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 210 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 400 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 14.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks Interactive on simulated mobile network at 71.8 s

A fast page load over a cellular network ensures a good mobile user experience

Estimated Input Latency 40 ms

Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy

Minify CSS Potential savings of 7 KB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 60 KB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 3,730 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Does not use HTTPS 17 insecure requests found

All sites should be protected with HTTPS, even ones that don't handle sensitive data. HTTPS prevents intruders from tampering with or passively listening in on the communications between your app and your users, and is a prerequisite for HTTP/2 and many new web platform APIs

User Timing marks and measures 8 user timings

Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences

Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 1,160 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 380 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Enable text compression Potential savings of 93 KB

Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes

Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 1,110 KB

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 310 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 560 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

Reduce JavaScript execution time 6.4 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 3,883 KB

Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive

Properly size images Potential savings of 2,714 KB

Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time

Speed Index 7.3 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 5.3 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 12,993 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimize main-thread work 11.6 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 0.8 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 7 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 18 chains found

The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load

Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,666 elements

A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 57 KB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

First Meaningful Paint 0.8 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Mobile

Avoid chaining critical requests 17 chains found

Avoid an excessive DOM size 1,693 elements

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 47 KB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

First Meaningful Paint 3.2 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 492 requests • 10,632 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 167 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 1,980 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 64.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks Interactive at 64.2 s

A fast page load over a cellular network ensures a good mobile user experience

First Contentful Paint (3G) 6765 ms

First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network

Estimated Input Latency 1,200 ms

Minify CSS Potential savings of 10 KB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Tap targets are not sized appropriately 96% appropriately sized tap targets

Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements

Document uses legible font sizes 98.74% legible text

Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 60 KB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 3,461 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Does not use HTTPS 15 insecure requests found

User Timing marks and measures 8 user timings

Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences

Server response times are low (TTFB) Root document took 570 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 930 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 941 KB

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Enable text compression Potential savings of 93 KB

Text-based resources should be served with compression (gzip, deflate or brotli) to minimize total network bytes

Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 12,970 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 11,060 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

Reduce JavaScript execution time 35.9 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 3,708 KB

Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive

Properly size images Potential savings of 1,281 KB

Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time

Speed Index 29.0 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 42.7 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoid enormous network payloads Total size was 10,632 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimize main-thread work 52.3 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 3.2 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 7 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Speed And Optimization Tips

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Local Rank: / Users: / PageViews:

Global Rank

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 07:35:30 GMT
Content-Type: text/html
Connection: keep-alive
Set-Cookie: __cfduid=d6641a495bdcf73769bc7d606900777361574840129; expires=Fri, 27-Dec-19 07:35:29 GMT; path=/; domain=.newtalk.tw; HttpOnly
Vary: Accept-Encoding
X-Powered-By: PHP/5.5.9-1ubuntu4.14
Set-Cookie: ___SID=ss5dde2741db3e4; expires=Fri, 27-Dec-2019 07:35:29 GMT; Max-Age=2592000
CF-Cache-Status: DYNAMIC
Expect-CT: max-age=604800, report-uri="https://report-uri.cloudflare.com/cdn-cgi/beacon/expect-ct"
Server: cloudflare
CF-RAY: 53c26cfa0de6c524-ORD
Content-Encoding: gzip

DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname

View DNS Records

Type	Name	Value	Class	TTL
A	newtalk.tw	104.26.15.217	IN	162
A	newtalk.tw	104.26.14.217	IN	162
NS	newtalk.tw	irma.ns.cloudflare.com	IN	21599
NS	newtalk.tw	simon.ns.cloudflare.com	IN	21599
MX	newtalk.tw	aspmx.l.google.com	IN	299
MX	newtalk.tw	alt3.aspmx.l.google.com	IN	299
MX	newtalk.tw	alt4.aspmx.l.google.com	IN	299
MX	newtalk.tw	alt1.aspmx.l.google.com	IN	299
MX	newtalk.tw	alt2.aspmx.l.google.com	IN	299
TXT	newtalk.tw	63o6t7k8advtonmnms9iqsfvln	IN	299
AAAA	newtalk.tw	2606:4700:20::681a:fd9	IN	162
AAAA	newtalk.tw	2606:4700:20::681a:ed9	IN	162

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

Latest Sites

Top Technologies

27 newtalk.tw Last Updated: 1 year

Desktop

Mobile

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

CloudFlare

comScore

Google Tag Manager

PHP

Twitter Bootstrap

Ubuntu

PWA - Manifest

Desktop

Mobile

Speed And Optimization Tips

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Information Server

Comments