Okwave.jp - SEO Checker - Website Review

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

質問・疑問に答えるQ&AサイトOKWAVE

okwave.jp

МУЖСКОЙ ЖУРНАЛ MAXIM ONLINE. ОФИЦИАЛЬНЫЙ САЙТ ЛУЧШЕГО МУЖСКОГО ЖУРНАЛА MAXIM.

maximonline.ru

LAMIAREPORT.GR

lamiareport.gr

delta-search.com

MY.COM — COMMUNICATION AND ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES: MYMAIL, MAPS.ME, AND GAMES.

my.com

HABER ZAMANI | HABERLER ZAMANINDA OKUNUR

haberzamani.com

魅族官网 - 魅族 16XS 手机,极边全面屏三摄长续航

meizu.com

Latest Sites

PORTSTONE PARTNERS LIMITED

portstonepartnersltd.com

VENICTRADE.COM

venictrade.com

COINLUNO.COM

coinluno.com

SIGNCURRENCY.COM

signcurrency.com

ALLTRADESFX.COM

alltradesfx.com

MODERN KITCHENS | READIKIT | HOME PAGE

readikit.com

av4.xyz

Top Technologies

Nginx

Web Servers

PHP

Programming Languages

Google Tag Manager

Tag Managers

Google Font API

Font Scripts

CloudFlare

CDN

jQuery

JavaScript Frameworks

Apache

Web Servers

Font Awesome

Font Scripts

WordPress

CMS

Twitter Bootstrap

Web Frameworks

2 okwave.jp Last Updated: 10 months

Success 47% of passed verification steps

Warning 7% of total warning

Errors 46% of total errors, require fast action

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 81%

Best Practices Desktop Score 69%

SEO Desktop Score 82%

Progressive Web App Desktop Score 19%

Performance Mobile Score 42%

Best Practices Mobile Score 69%

SEO Mobile Score 91%

Progressive Web App Mobile Score 59%

Page Authority Authority 0%

Domain Authority Domain Authority 0%

Moz Rank 0.0/10

Bounce Rate Rate 0%

Charset Encoding

Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8

Title Tag 25 Characters

質問・疑問に答えるQ&AサイトOKWAVE

Meta Description 90 Characters

OKWAVE(オウケイウェイヴ)は年間7,000万人が利用する日本発、最大級のQ＆Aサイト。あなたの質問にみんなが回答をしてくれるため、疑問や悩みをすばやく解決することができます。

Effective URL 17 Characters

https://okwave.jp

Excerpt Page content

質問・疑問に答えるQ&AサイトOKWAVE みんなのQ&A 年間7,000万人が利用！最大級のQ&Aコミュニティ専門家のQ&A みんなの悩みに専門家が回答します ...

Meta Keywords 8 Detected

Q＆A 知恵袋疑問質問解決検索トラブル教えて

Keywords Cloud Density

困ってます101 ベストアンサー84 すぐに回答を45 暇なときにでも24 もっと見る19 okwave18 aランキングページへ17 アンケート14 webサービス11 ビジネス10

Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO

Keyword	Freq	Title	Desc	Domain	H1	H2
困ってます	101
ベストアンサー	84
すぐに回答を	45
暇なときにでも	24
もっと見る	19
okwave	18
aランキングページへ	17
アンケート	14
webサービス	11
ビジネス	10

Google Preview Your look like this in google search result

質問・疑問に答えるQ&AサイトOKWAVE

https://okwave.jp

Robots.txt File Detected

http://okwave.jp/robots.txt

Sitemap.xml File No Found

http://okwave.jp/sitemap.xml

Page Size Code & Text Ratio

Document Size: ~489.54 KB

Code Size: ~247.2 KB

Text Size: ~242.34 KB Ratio: 49.50%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Desktop

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 171 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

User Timing marks and measures 16 user timings

Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences

Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 1,350 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 100 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 28 KB

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 10 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 10 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

JavaScript execution time 0.5 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 181 KB

Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive

Properly size images Potential savings of 24 KB

Serve images that are appropriately-sized to save cellular data and improve load time

Speed Index 2.5 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 1.9 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 1,571 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimizes main-thread work 1.8 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 0.7 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 6 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 21 chains found

The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load

Avoid an excessive DOM size 5,811 elements

A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

First Meaningful Paint 0.7 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 167 requests • 1,571 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 81 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 60 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 2.2 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Page load is not fast enough on mobile networks Interactive on simulated mobile network at 12.3 s

A fast page load over a cellular network ensures a good mobile user experience

Estimated Input Latency 20 ms

Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy

Minify CSS Potential savings of 2 KB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 23 KB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Mobile

Estimated Input Latency 60 ms

First Contentful Paint (3G) 6155 ms

First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network

Tap targets are not sized appropriately 89% appropriately sized tap targets

Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements

Document uses legible font sizes 88.96% legible text

Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px

Remove unused CSS Potential savings of 26 KB

Remove dead rules from stylesheets and defer the loading of CSS not used for above-the-fold content to reduce unnecessary bytes consumed by network activity

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 13 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Avoid multiple page redirects Potential savings of 780 ms

Redirects introduce additional delays before the page can be loaded

User Timing marks and measures 8 user timings

Consider instrumenting your app with the User Timing API to measure your app's real-world performance during key user experiences

Reduce server response times (TTFB) Root document took 1,180 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 450 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Reduce the impact of third-party code Third-party code blocked the main thread for 630 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 550 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

Reduce JavaScript execution time 2.0 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Defer offscreen images Potential savings of 59 KB

Consider lazy-loading offscreen and hidden images after all critical resources have finished loading to lower time to interactive

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Speed Index 7.7 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 8.0 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 789 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimize main-thread work 4.1 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 3.2 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 3 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 8 chains found

Avoids an excessive DOM size 592 elements

First Meaningful Paint 3.2 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 74 requests • 789 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 32 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 220 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 8.9 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Speed And Optimization Tips

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Local Rank: / Users: / PageViews:

Global Rank

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Date: Wed, 25 Dec 2019 17:51:57 GMT
Server: Apache
X-Frame-Options: sameorigin
X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff
Vary: User-Agent,Cookie
Pragma: no-cache
Cache-Control: no-cache
Connection: close
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8

DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname

View DNS Records

Type	Name	Value	Class	TTL
A	okwave.jp	210.132.71.10	IN	3523
NS	okwave.jp	kcdns2.okwave.jp	IN	86400
NS	okwave.jp	kcdns6.okwave.jp	IN	3600
NS	okwave.jp	kcdns5.okwave.jp	IN	3600
NS	okwave.jp	kcdns1.okwave.jp	IN	86400
MX	okwave.jp	kcmx1.okwave.jp	IN	3600
MX	okwave.jp	kcmx2.okwave.jp	IN	3600
TXT	okwave.jp	v=spf1 ip4:210.132.71.0/24 ip4:211.132.7.120 ip4:211.132.7.123 ip4:211.132.7.121 ip4:122.216.211.50 ~all	IN	3600

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

Latest Sites

Top Technologies

2 okwave.jp Last Updated: 10 months

Desktop

Mobile

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Desktop

Mobile

Speed And Optimization Tips

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Information Server

Comments