Sat.gob.mx - SEO Checker - Website Review

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

GUCCI® US OFFICIAL SITE | REDEFINING MODERN LUXURY FASHION

gucci.com

THE STIR BY CAFEMOM

cafemom.com

THE EXPRESS TRIBUNE: ENGLISH NEWS & UPDATES WEBSITE IN PAKISTAN

tribune.com.pk

PLAYER FM - PODCAST SMARTER

player.fm

BEAUTY TIPS, CELEBRITY STYLE AND FASHION ADVICE FROM INSTYLE

instyle.com

HOME | THOMSON REUTERS

thomsonreuters.com

L'ÉQUIPE - L'ACTUALITÉ DU SPORT EN CONTINU.

lequipe.fr

Latest Sites

mastercoin.top

COMPASS MARKETING, INC.

compassmarketinginc.net

compassmarketing.net

COMPASS

wap.compassidn.com

JUST A MOMENT...

btconline.io

CLUBSHOP ONLINE MALL - CASH BACK, ONLINE MALL STORES, SHOP ONLINE, ONLINE MALL DIRECTORY

clubshop.com

THE BEST FREE BITCOIN MINER 2021 | START MINING NOW : BITBASE POOL

bitbase.club

Top Technologies

Nginx

Web Servers

PHP

Programming Languages

Google Tag Manager

Tag Managers

Google Font API

Font Scripts

CloudFlare

CDN

jQuery

JavaScript Frameworks

Apache

Web Servers

Font Awesome

Font Scripts

WordPress

CMS

Twitter Bootstrap

Web Frameworks

85 sat.gob.mx Last Updated: 1 year

Success 55% of passed verification steps

Warning 15% of total warning

Errors 30% of total errors, require fast action

Mobile

Performance Desktop Score 80%

Best Practices Desktop Score 85%

SEO Desktop Score 89%

Progressive Web App Desktop Score 54%

Performance Mobile Score 42%

Best Practices Mobile Score 85%

SEO Mobile Score 91%

Progressive Web App Mobile Score 56%

Page Authority Authority 51%

Domain Authority Domain Authority 87%

Moz Rank 5.1/10

Bounce Rate Rate 0%

Charset Encoding

Great, language/character encoding is specified: UTF-8

Title Tag 47 Characters

PORTAL DE TRÁMITES Y SERVICIOS - SAT

Meta Description 34 Characters

Portal de trámites y servicios sat

Effective URL 27 Characters

https://www.sat.gob.mx/home

Excerpt Page content

Portal de trámites y servicios - SAT ...

Keywords Cloud Density

conoce11 obligaciones10 personas8 presenta8 trámites7 sector7 portal7 primario7 para6 otros6

Keyword Consistency Keyword density is one of the main terms in SEO

Keyword	Freq	Title	Desc	Domain	H1	H2
conoce	11
obligaciones	10
personas	8
presenta	8
trámites	7
sector	7
portal	7
primario	7
para	6
otros	6

Google Preview Your look like this in google search result

PORTAL DE TRÁMITES Y SERVICIOS - SAT

https://www.sat.gob.mx/home

Portal de trámites y servicios sat

Robots.txt File No Found

http://sat.gob.mx/robots.txt

Sitemap.xml File No Found

http://sat.gob.mx/sitemap.xml

Whois Is a query and response protocol that is widely used for querying databases that store the registered users or assignees of an Internet resource, such as a domain name, an IP address block, or an autonomous system

Updated: 2019-09-06 / 2 years

Create on: 1998-02-18 / 23 years

Expires on: 2020-02-17 / 12 months 26 days

Akky (Una division de NIC Mexico) ,Mexico Mexico Mexico Mexico

Servicio de Administracion Tributaria Administrador Seguridad de la informacion Administrador Seguridad de la Informacion Administrador Seguridad de la informacion

Nameservers

huitzilopochtli.sat.gob.mx

200.57.3.8

tlahuizcalpantecuhtli.sat.gob.mx

200.33.74.41

Page Size Code & Text Ratio

Document Size: ~74.66 KB

Code Size: ~47.98 KB

Text Size: ~26.68 KB Ratio: 35.73%

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

PWA - Manifest

Manifest is not valid

Your site don't have valid manifest.json, read more in Web App Manifest

Desktop

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 0 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 0 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

JavaScript execution time 0.1 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Speed Index 1.6 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 1.9 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 940 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimizes main-thread work 0.4 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 1.6 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 6 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 31 chains found

The Critical Request Chains below show you what resources are loaded with a high priority. Consider reducing the length of chains, reducing the download size of resources, or deferring the download of unnecessary resources to improve page load

Avoids an excessive DOM size 576 elements

A large DOM will increase memory usage, cause longer [style calculations](https://developers.google.com/web/fundamentals/performance/rendering/reduce-the-scope-and-complexity-of-style-calculations), and produce costly [layout reflows](https://developers.google.com/speed/articles/reflow)

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 5 KB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

First Meaningful Paint 1.9 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 52 requests • 940 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 50 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 20 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 1.9 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Estimated Input Latency 10 ms

Estimated Input Latency is an estimate of how long your app takes to respond to user input, in milliseconds, during the busiest 5s window of page load. If your latency is higher than 50 ms, users may perceive your app as laggy

Minify CSS Potential savings of 3 KB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 237 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Server response times are low (TTFB) Root document took 200 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 1,380 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 117 KB

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Mobile

Minify CSS Potential savings of 3 KB

Minifying CSS files can reduce network payload sizes

Tap targets are sized appropriately 100% appropriately sized tap targets

Interactive elements like buttons and links should be large enough (48x48px), and have enough space around them, to be easy enough to tap without overlapping onto other elements

Document uses legible font sizes 99.87% legible text

Font sizes less than 12px are too small to be legible and require mobile visitors to “pinch to zoom” in order to read. Strive to have >60% of page text ≥12px

Serve images in next-gen formats Potential savings of 237 KB

Image formats like JPEG 2000, JPEG XR, and WebP often provide better compression than PNG or JPEG, which means faster downloads and less data consumption

Server response times are low (TTFB) Root document took 30 ms

Time To First Byte identifies the time at which your server sends a response

Eliminate render-blocking resources Potential savings of 3,990 ms

Resources are blocking the first paint of your page. Consider delivering critical JS/CSS inline and deferring all non-critical JS/styles

Efficiently encode images Potential savings of 117 KB

Optimized images load faster and consume less cellular data

Minimize third-party usage Third-party code blocked the main thread for 110 ms

Third-party code can significantly impact load performance. Limit the number of redundant third-party providers and try to load third-party code after your page has primarily finished loading

Total Blocking Time 0 ms

Sum of all time periods between FCP and Time to Interactive, when task length exceeded 50ms, expressed in milliseconds.

JavaScript execution time 0.8 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling, and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

Server Backend Latencies 0 ms

Server latencies can impact web performance. If the server latency of an origin is high, it's an indication the server is overloaded or has poor backend performance

Speed Index 6.1 s

Speed Index shows how quickly the contents of a page are visibly populated

First CPU Idle 6.7 s

First CPU Idle marks the first time at which the page's main thread is quiet enough to handle input. [Learn more](https://web.dev/first-cpu-idle).

Avoids enormous network payloads Total size was 1,014 KB

Large network payloads cost users real money and are highly correlated with long load times

Minimize main-thread work 2.4 s

Consider reducing the time spent parsing, compiling and executing JS. You may find delivering smaller JS payloads helps with this

First Contentful Paint 6.1 s

First Contentful Paint marks the time at which the first text or image is painted

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities 6 vulnerabilities detected

Some third-party scripts may contain known security vulnerabilities that are easily identified and exploited by attackers

Avoid chaining critical requests 31 chains found

Avoids an excessive DOM size 576 elements

Minify JavaScript Potential savings of 5 KB

Minifying JavaScript files can reduce payload sizes and script parse time

First Meaningful Paint 6.7 s

First Meaningful Paint measures when the primary content of a page is visible

Keep request counts low and transfer sizes small 54 requests • 1,014 KB

To set budgets for the quantity and size of page resources, add a budget.json file

Serve static assets with an efficient cache policy 52 resources found

A long cache lifetime can speed up repeat visits to your page

Max Potential First Input Delay 30 ms

The maximum potential First Input Delay that your users could experience is the duration, in milliseconds, of the longest task

Time to Interactive 6.7 s

Time to interactive is the amount of time it takes for the page to become fully interactive

Network Round Trip Times 0 ms

Network round trip times (RTT) have a large impact on performance. If the RTT to an origin is high, it's an indication that servers closer to the user could improve performance

Estimated Input Latency 10 ms

First Contentful Paint (3G) 12105 ms

First Contentful Paint 3G marks the time at which the first text or image is painted while on a 3G network

Speed And Optimization Tips

Only Registered Users

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Local Rank: / Users: / PageViews:

Global Rank

Information Server

Response Header HTTP headers carry information about the client browser, the requested page and the server

HTTP/1.1 200 OK
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Connection: keep-alive
Date: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 01:02:51 GMT
Server: Oracle-HTTP-Server Oracle-Web-Cache-11g/11.1.1.9.0 (H;max-age=214748162+0;age=727;ecid=23538420960296,0:1)
Cache-Control: no-store
Last-Modified: Wed, 27 Nov 2019 01:02:51 GMT
host_service: FutureTenseContentServer:11.1.1.8.0
Content-Language: en
Content-Encoding: gzip
Cache-Control: no-store
Cache-Control: no-cache
Via: 1.1 wwwmat.sat.gob.mx (Access Gateway-ag-B8A734F6C104BFD5-129128606), 1.1 6970aae0c617a1b9b328fc27b7cb6e3c.cloudfront.net (CloudFront)
Vary: Accept-Encoding
X-Cache: Hit from cloudfront
X-Amz-Cf-Pop: ORD51-C2
X-Amz-Cf-Id: VKM9fy7ABh8GYvpDcFiCESAmAIBitfe01OWWRaXQjaSqt1501aBzww==
Age: 25181

DNS Records DNS Resource Records associated with a hostname

View DNS Records

Type	Name	Value	Class	TTL
A	sat.gob.mx	200.33.84.233	IN	268
NS	sat.gob.mx	tlahuizcalpantecuhtli.sat.gob.mx	IN	298
NS	sat.gob.mx	xolotl.sat.gob.mx	IN	298
NS	sat.gob.mx	huitzilopochtli.sat.gob.mx	IN	298
NS	sat.gob.mx	tochtli.sat.gob.mx	IN	298
NS	sat.gob.mx	quetzalcoatl.sat.gob.mx	IN	298
MX	sat.gob.mx	mx.sat.gob.mx	IN	299
TXT	sat.gob.mx	v=spf1 mx a ip4:200.57.3.0/24 ip4:200.33.84.0/24 -all	IN	1799
TXT	sat.gob.mx	MS=37B3EA4A77F1E456D15CD4599E82923FDA315A2A	IN	1799

Your Website Score is

Similar Ranking

Latest Sites

Top Technologies

85 sat.gob.mx Last Updated: 1 year

Desktop

Mobile

Estimation Traffic and Earnings

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Technologies

Amazon Cloudfront

jQuery

Oracle HTTP Server

Oracle Web Cache

OWL Carousel

PWA - Manifest

Desktop

Mobile

Speed And Optimization Tips

Sign up for see all features and reviews about this site

Alexa Rank

0

Information Server

Comments